By José Quintero Weir
English version: Daniel Cooper Bermudez
Spanish version
On Boaventura de Sousa’s article about Venezuela.
In this piece, I am not going to dive into the conceptual structure of what throughout the so-called “Welfare State” period – developed after the Second World War and the so-called “Cold War” – which became the theoretical framework to analyze and comprehend the social phenomena that emerged and continued emerging in colonized societies of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. It happened in such a way that texts such as “Imperialism, the Highest Phase of Capitalism” by Vladimir I. Lenin have resulted insurmountable for theorists of so-called “critical theory” throughout the world, especially when the task is to preach about the fights to death that indigenous peoples, black peoples, and the very poor in their respective continents and countries wage against those who oppress and murder them in their own countries, with assistance from imperial forces (capitalist or “socialist”). Most of all, we are against the evangelization of renowned theorists who, from some academic office, platonically think and determine not only the course of history but the obligation of communities to be subjugated that destiny. Doing so very much in the shadow of the academic bubble from where, without risk or commitment, they determine the necessity of the subjugation of the shirtless and oppressed.
We say this because a couple of days ago Boaventura gave us his opinion on how “North American imperialism was going to invade Venezuela to stop the ‘chavista revolution’ in order to keep our oil reserves.” This is only a half-truth as he is not acknowledging the struggle of an entire population of an impoverished middle class and of the very poor who can no longer stand the misery to which they have been condemned. He applies a type of sociology of absences, choosing to not observe what in this moment emerges as an emergency. Nonetheless, despite being sure that Boaventura knows it as he has suggested that “possibly” the “government of the revolution” has committed “mistakes,” the simple fact of calling themselves a “revolution” seems to award them an anti-imperialist stance and even enough ethical stature. Meanwhile President Maduro signed contracts with North American oil and mining companies saying that “with the signing of these commercial deals my hope is that I can shake hands with President Trump.”
Because the “revolution” hasn’t been very revolutionary, and their left hasn’t been very “leftist.”
We have been insisting on this since 2005; but of course, our voice does not have the resonance of those that in speaking already demand. Visually speaking, when we arch are hands around our mouths and yell, intellectuals of both the “left” and the “right” are speaking with microphones and speakerphones at high volumes. Nonetheless, the events in Venezuela, despite the media blackout that the insurgency from below suffers from, be it from the official State media (approximately 90% of the television channels and radio media of the country), but also from private and international media, where the war-like scenarios to be discussed below are TOTALLY PROHIBITED from being diffused. Thus, the analysis which states that the supposed “popular revolution from the left” is confronting North American imperialism whose sole desire is to take over Venezuela’s oil reserves is only half-true, or rather, whoever says this is someone who truly does not know or understand what is happening or how it is happening, and this half-truth is the less risky theoretical act. If we are actually going to evaluate what is happening, such an analysis, in truth, is wrong.
Let’s summarize this with the latest occurrences:
In the sector of El Saladillo in Maracaibo, the government hoped to do what they had done in Maracay and Valencia, to break open the gates with their tanks to make way for their ‘colectivos’ of criminals on motorcycles who would break into people’s apartments, rob their belongings, and sexually abuse the women and children, fleeing with the booty that the government allocates them with. But the people of El Saladillo are prepared, as soon as the ‘colectivos’ and tanks peaked around the corner they were received with gun shots and Molotov bombs that set fire to the National Guard tanks. Many of the assailants on motorcycles are injured and the community is able to protect their families from the horde of ‘revolutionaries’ in the government.
Finally, I come back to the inspection of the few voting centers installed by the government to try to impose their Constituent Assembly, noting how evidently solitary these were. We wait, in the afternoons, for what neither the government nor the MUD, in their power plays, had foreseen; in which case both the government and the MUD are acting to cause an imperialist intervention as the situation is taking a toll beyond the calculation of both factors. Explaining this requires a pause that is not my interest at the moment. But we promise to analyze this as it is time to abandon all the sophistry committed and begin to think from us and by us.
Pingback: Boaventura tiene razón, pero está equivocado. | laguarura.info
Pingback: Boaventura has a point, but is wrong. – Pa'lante